How to Become a Reviewer
ProData welcomes expressions of interest from qualified researchers who are enthusiastic about contributing to the academic community through peer review. Our reviewers play a vital role in upholding the quality, rigor, and integrity of the research we publish.
We invite experts from all disciplines represented in our journal — including science, technology, engineering, medicine, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields — to apply.
Who Can Apply?
You may be eligible to become a reviewer if you:
- Hold a PhD or equivalent research degree
- Have published at least two peer-reviewed articles as a lead or corresponding author
- Possess subject expertise relevant to the journal’s scope
- Are committed to providing fair, constructive, and timely reviews
- Support ethical and inclusive research practices
We encourage applications from early-career researchers, researchers from underrepresented regions or institutions, and interdisciplinary scholars.
Benefits of Reviewing
Becoming a reviewer for ProData allows you to:
- Stay informed about the latest research in your field
- Gain recognition for your scholarly service (e.g., through ORCID, Publons)
- Strengthen your academic CV
- Contribute to the integrity and advancement of interdisciplinary science
- Receive annual acknowledgments and reviewer certificates (on request)
How to Apply
To express interest in becoming a reviewer, please email us at contact@intellectpress.com
You will be asked to provide:
- A brief academic biography or CV
- Areas of expertise and relevant keywords
- ORCID iD (optional but recommended)
- Links to recent publications or your personal research page
Your application will be reviewed by our editorial team. If accepted, you may be invited to review manuscripts in your areas of expertise. You can always decline review invitations when unavailable.
We aim to assign no more than 2–4 reviews per year, unless you express a willingness to take on more.
Reviewer Code of Conduct
All reviewers are expected to follow our Guidelines for Peer Review and uphold confidentiality, impartiality, and respectful communication throughout the process. We also align with the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
